Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez calls the Green New Deal the ‘moonshot’ of our generation, and she just released the basics of her ambitious plan

A workman uses a machine to clean panels at a UK solar farm on July 29, 2015.

A workman uses a machine to clean panels at a UK solar farm on July 29, 2015.
Peter Macdiarmid/Getty Images

  • A top policy priority for Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has consistently been a Green New Deal – a comprehensive plan to address climate change.
  • Ocasio-Cortez wants the country to implement a carbon-free, 100% renewable energy system and a modernized electrical grid by 2035.
  • The Green New Deal is a package of policies meant to stimulate the US economy by increasing public investment in clean-energy jobs and infrastructure projects.
  • While the plan’s specifics had been somewhat nebulous, Ocasio-Cortez and Sen. Ed Markey have finally released a working outline for the Green New Deal.

Anyone who’s followed Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s rise to power has probably heard about the “Green New Deal.”

It’s an idea touted by Democrats – Senator Kamala Harris recently endorsed it too – as a way to address climate change by investing federal money in large-scale infrastructure projects that help the country transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy. In the process, it would ideally create a wealth of American jobs.

Ocasio-Cortez’s version of the plan calls for meeting 100% of national power demand through renewable sources, eliminating greenhouse-gas emissions from transportation, and guaranteeing a job to any citizen who wants to work.

“This is going to be the Great Society, the moonshot, the civil rights movement of our generation,” she said during a climate change town-hall event with Senator Bernie Sanders in December 2018. “That is the scale of the ambition that this movement is going to require.”

Edward Barbier, a professor of economics at Colorado State University, told Business Insider that this type of rhetoric is arguably “the first time that the US – or any major Western economy – has proposed a comprehensive 20-year plan for a green transition.”

But until now, the details of a Green New Deal have been sparse.

On February 5, Ocasio-Cortez and Democratic Sen. Ed Markey of Massachusetts, released a framework for the Green New Deal. NPR, which first broke the news, posted the full document here.

The outline calls for a series of “10-year national mobilizations” towards accomplishing climate change, as well as policy goals like net-zero greenhouse gas emissions and infrastructure resilient against natural disasters. It highlights five goals, 12 projects, and 15 requirements in total.

It’s still short on details about how to implement the projects and achieve the goals.

The duo is set to introduce the resolution in the House of Representatives today.

Shooting for carbon neutrality within a decade

If the resolution passes, it wouldn’t require the House to take any action in order to fulfill the Green New Deal’s aims, because it’s nonbinding. This means the resolution itself creates no mandates or programs.

But it would make a statement about the Democrats’ intentions, and provide a road map for the coming years. “In 10 years, we’re trying to go carbon-neutral,” Ocasio-Cortez told NPR.

Headlining the resolution are the following broad objectives: net-zero greenhouse gas emissions, millions of new jobs, sustainable infrastructure, and clean air and water – all while protecting historically marginalized groups, promoting equality, and providing universal healthcare.

In order to achieve those goals, the Green New Deal calls for building energy-efficient infrastructure that is also resilient to climate change-related disasters, switching to “clean, renewable, and zero-emission energy sources,” eliminating pollution and emissions from farms and transportation systems, and cleaning hazardous waste sites.

The resolution doesn’t explicitly call for a ban on fossil fuels like coal and oil – an omission that has some environmental activists worried. “There’s some real questions as to why there wasn’t a ban called for,” Vijay Das, senior campaign strategist with progressive policy group Demos, told Politico after having read an early draft.

On her website, Ocasio-Cortez, who represents New York’s 14th Congressional district, said she considers climate change to be the “single biggest national security threat for the United States and the single biggest threat to worldwide industrialized civilization.”

Ocasio-Cortez and other Green New Deal supporters see the plan as a way to take on that enormous threat while stimulating the national economy at the same time.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez addresses the crowd and kicks off the 3rd Annual Woman's March in Manhattan on January 19, 2019.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez addresses the crowd and kicks off the 3rd Annual Woman’s March in Manhattan on January 19, 2019.
Ira L. Black/Corbis via Getty Images

Traditionally, those opposed to taking action on climate change have argued that such policies would harm the US economy in the short term, since our energy systems rely heavily on coal, oil, and gas. (That’s the justification President Trump gave when he announced his intention to pull the US out of the Paris climate agreement.)

The Green New Deal flips that logic on its head by taking both its name and inspiration from Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s New Deal. That initiative included a series of programs introduced during the Great Depression to boost prosperity, protect workers, and provide public-works jobs.

Ocasio-Cortez’s website listed the Green New Deal’s major environmental goals prior to the newly-introduced resolution.

The first is to meet all of the country’s power needs with renewable sources like solar, wind, geothermal energy, and hydroelectric power. Homes and buildings would get upgraded to be more energy efficient, and greenhouse-gas emissions would be eliminated from the manufacturing, agricultural, and transportation sectors.

The plan also calls for a huge investment in technologies that could curb greenhouse gases, eventually reaching a point where the concentration of those gases in the atmosphere starts to decline.

Additionally, Ocasio-Cortez and others want to make green technology, products, and services – anything from clean energy to non-toxic cleaning products – a major US export.

renewable energy, solar panel, wind turbine

Creative commons

Finally, the Green New Deal calls for the creation of a national “smart grid” that would increase energy efficiency and allow for more renewable energy sources.

This type of technology would rely on advanced sensors to track and relay information about power supply and demand, making it easier to locate failures and re-route electricity to places that need it. That would help avoid the blackouts that can happen when electricity demand exceeds supply.

The economic stimulus aspect of the plan is equally ambitious

The Green New Deal’s other major selling point is that it is designed to put more Americans to work in green jobs, like manufacturing electric cars or retrofitting homes with solar panels.

Ocasio-Cortez’s initial description of the plan in December 2018 includes a “job guarantee program to assure a living wage job to every person who wants one.” It would also provide people with the training and education needed to transition into one of those green jobs.

“It’s critically important for the United States to make the transition to a low-carbon economy,” Richard Howarth, professor and chair of environmental studies at Dartmouth College, told Business Insider. “Implementing the required technologies and infrastructure will create business and employment opportunities that could be targeted to communities in need of jobs and redevelopment.”

Most economists believe a Green New Deal would indeed create new jobs, according to Pacific Standard magazine. A 2014 report by economists from the University of Massachusetts­-Amherst noted that cutting US carbon emissions by 40% in 20 years would require an investment of $200 billion annually, but create 4.2 million jobs.

One team member extrapolated those results to give Pacific Standard a rough estimate of how many jobs would be created if the US were to cut 100% of its emissions: somewhere around 6.8 million new jobs.

In the new resolution, Ocasio-Cortez noted that legislation needs to be aware of poor, disabled and minority communities that could be affected by the Green New Deal’s massive economic transition, NPR reported.

The Green New Deal’s second wind

Ocasio-Cortez thrust the Green New Deal into the spotlight in November 2018. Before she was sworn in, she joined environmental activists from the Sunrise Movement, a group of young people who advocate for climate policy, in a demonstration outside Nancy Pelosi’s office. The group was calling for the creation of a new committee on climate change: the Select Committee for a Green New Deal.

But the idea of a Green New Deal had been circulating long before that. In 2007, journalist Thomas Friedman explained the concept in The New York Times.

“The right rallying call is for a ‘Green New Deal,'” he wrote. “The New Deal was not built on a magic bullet, but on a broad range of programs and industrial projects to revitalize America. Ditto for an energy New Deal.”

The United Nations Environment Programme began to promote the concept in 2008, and in 2009, President Obama earmarked $90 billion for renewables, clean electricity, and a smart grid in his administration’s $800 billion stimulus package.

But since then, the news about our climate has continued to worsen. The oceans just had the hottest year on record, and a costly wildfire in California sent energy giant PG&E into bankruptcy.

renewable earth 2100

Benoit Tessier/ Reuters

Armed with that ammunition, grassroots environmental groups like the Sunrise Movement have renewed the push for a Green New Deal. And companies like Apple, Facebook, Microsoft, Google, Ikea, Coca-Cola, and GM have committed to go 100% renewable regardless of federal action.

How do we pay for the Green New Deal?

Much of the discussion so far about the Green New Deal has centered on how to pay for its lofty objectives. Implementing these policies could cost “trillions upon trillions of dollars,” according to NPR.

The draft text on Ocasio-Cortez’s website asserts little more than the idea that “the majority of financing of the plan shall be accomplished by the federal government.”

This new resolution offers nothing in the way of proposed funding options either.

In a January 60 Minutes interview, she suggested taxing the richest Americans at a rate of 60-70% in order to secure that funding. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez from New York is one of the Green New Deal's vocal supporters.

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez from New York is one of the Green New Deal’s vocal supporters.
Hollis Johnson/Business Insider

A carbon tax is also an option; in that scenario, the government would charge companies a fee for the carbon dioxide that they emit.

“Carbon-tax revenues could be used to hold down taxes,” Howarth said.

However the Green New Deal gets paid for, Barbier made two suggestions in an analysis published in Nature. First, he said, the US government should end subsidies that encourage fossil-fuel energy production. Second, the plan needs to avoid dramatically increasing the federal deficit.

“Saddling future generations with unsustainable levels of national debt is just as dangerous as burdening them with an economy that is environmentally unsustainable,” Barbier wrote, adding, “efforts to boost green sectors should pay for themselves.”

The Green New Deal’s future is still up in the air

Ocasio-Cortez has succeeded in generating enthusiasm for a Green New Deal, with 92% of Democrats and 64% of Republicans supporting such a plan, according to one survey. But it’s unlikely the resolution will pass in the House, let alone in the Republican-controlled Senate.

Republican opponents aside, even Democrat Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s attitude towards the plan remains lukewarm at best.

“Someone’s going to have to prove to me how that can be accomplished because it looks to me like for the foreseeable future we’re gonna be using a substantial amount of fossil fuels,” Rep. Francis Rooney, R-Fla., co-chair of the bipartisan Climate Solutions Caucus, told NPR.

While bipartisan squabbling over the plan’s ambitious goals might cause the Green New Deal to stagnate for now, there’s still reason for hope, according to former Vice President Al Gore.

“The Green New Deal resolution marks the beginning of a crucial dialogue on climate legislation in the US,” Gore said in a statement on his website. “The goals are ambitious and comprehensive – now the work begins to decide the best ways to achieve them, with specific policy solutions tied to timelines.”

The details of how these goals will be achieved are still up in the air. In a sense, that ambiguity mirrors the original New Deal, according to Stephen Cohen, a professor at Columbia University’s School of International and Public Affairs.

FDR’s approach was, similarly, “a series of improvisations in response to specific problems,” Cohen wrote in a blog post. He added, “advocates should avoid the trap of attempting to spell out every detail of a program that should be innovative and experimental and not set in concrete.”

Whatever details get nailed down, the Green New Deal is likely to be a topic of conversation in the upcoming election cycle.

“At this stage, the Green New Deal is more a set of guiding aspirations than a concrete policy proposal,” Howarth said. “The specifics are going to depend on the framing and outcome of the 2020 presidential election.”