- Thomson Reuters
President Donald Trump’s national security adviser made a startling statement to ABC’s George Stephanopoulos on “This Week” on Sunday.
When asked whether the US could tolerate a fully nuclear-capable North Korea, Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster questioned how the military had dealt with nuclear nations for decades.
“The classical deterrence theory, how does that apply to a regime like the regime in North Korea?” McMaster said.
McMaster characterized North Korea as engaging in “unspeakable brutality against its own people” and posing “a continuous threat to its neighbors” – and now the US – with nuclear weapons. He also said the country’s leader, Kim Jong Un, would imprison and murder “anyone who seems to oppose that regime, including members of his own family.”
Trump’s national security adviser fundamentally believing that North Korea cannot be deterred could have massive policy implications. Essentially, if the US’s superior nuclear might couldn’t cause North Korea to back down, it would make sense to attack before it developed full nuclear capability.
But McMaster’s characterization of North Korea as a regime beyond the pale of rationality also has some issues. To varying degrees, both the Soviet Union and China engaged in similar brutality, threats, and murder and oppression of dissidents.
In 1957, during the US and Soviet Union’s heated arms race, the Chinese leader Mao Zedong said: “I’m not afraid of nuclear war. There are 2.7 billion people in the world; it doesn’t matter if some are killed. China has a population of 600 million; even if half of them are killed, there are still 300 million people left. I’m not afraid of anyone.”
But nuclear war never broke out. Though the US sought to contain the spread of communism during the Cold War, it never attacked China, even as it built a nuclear arsenal.
- Thomson Reuters
Experts contacted by Business Insider have previously said Kim is indeed a rational actor who can be expected to observe established rules of deterrence.
The consensus among North Korea watchers is that Kim seeks nuclear weapons for regime security, and while his newfound nuclear prowess could strike a US city, the US’s response would leave nothing left of North Korea.