- John Zimmer
- Lyft and Juno, two New York City competitors with Uber, filed a lawsuit on Wednesday to block a new minimum wage for drivers that was set to take effect on Friday.
- The companies argue the complicated formula that set a pay floor at $17.22 an hour after expenses unfairly benefits Uber.
- A judge did not grant the injunction, but directed Lyft and Juno to place funds intended for drivers into an escrow account while the case is pending.
With 36 hours left before ride-hailing drivers in New York City were set to get a legally mandated minimum wage – a raise, in most cases – Lyft and Juno filed a lawsuit asking the court to delay its implementation.
Their injunction wasn’t granted, but the judge did allow the companies to place the money intended for drivers into an escrow account, essentially a lockbox, while the case is pending.
Following a temporary restraining order granted by a judge on Friday, Lyft said it would be immediately raising driver pay, but still intends to fight the Taxi and Limousine Commission’s approach, which it calls unfair.
“This TRO victory acknowledges that Uber was handed a sweetheart deal by the TLC that would irreparably harm Lyft,” the company said in a statement. “Drivers shouldn’t suffer while we work to right the TLC’s mistakes so we are immediately raising driver pay as we continue our fight in court.”
On Wednesday, Lyft and Juno, two of the smaller ride-hailing competitors in New York, the nation’s largest taxi market, argued that the new minimum wage law that was set to take effect on Friday unfairly benefits Uber.
The $17.22 per hour minimum (after expenses) is set through a formula that uses an industry-wide “utilization rate, which the crux of Lyft and Juno’s argument against the law. For the next 12 months, that rate is 58%.
When that time period is up, companies can petition to use their own utilization rates if they are higher than 58%. According to the study commissioned by the City Council to write the new rules, Lyft’s rate was tied with Uber at 58%, while Juno’s was lower, at 50%.
That’s key, because as the rate increases, it causes the fraction that decides driver pay to decrease. Here’s the formula:
Lyft says that because Uber is by far the dominant player, it can easily raise its utilization rate, and therefore pay drivers less and keep fares low.
“It’s no secret that Uber has tried to put us out of business in the past. They’ve failed repeatedly, and the TLC should not assist them in their efforts,” a company spokesperson said at the time.
- Quartz Atlas
Conversely, Uber says it will not be following Lyft and Juno’s lead to withhold driver pay.
“Judge Andrea Masley offered Uber the chance to join Lyft and Juno in keeping a portion of drivers’ earnings in a lockbox account while their suits moved forward,” it said through a spokesperson. “We decline and notified the Taxi & Limousine Commission and the Court that we do not intend to hold back any portion of drivers’ earnings.”
Juno did not respond to a request for comment from Business Insider.
Via, also one of Uber’s smaller competitor in New York City and the only one with a higher utilization rate due to its high percentage of shared rides, said it also supports the new minimum wage rules.
“Via is proud to be the industry leader in driver pay, consistently offering drivers the opportunity to take home the highest earnings in NYC,” it said. “We also believe strongly that holding companies to utilization standards is an important step in reducing congestion causing single-occupancy trips and we support the TLC in this goal.”
New York’s Taxi and Limousine Commission said its concerned by the court’s allowing Lyft and Juno to withhold funds from drivers.
“Though we are heartened that the Judge did not issue a TRO,” commissioners and chair Meera Joshi said through a spokesperson.
“We are concerned that by allowing these companies to pay into escrow instead of paying drivers, professional drivers who live from paycheck to paycheck will be deprived of the benefit of their well deserved and long overdue raise.”
The next court hearing is set for March 12, 2019.