- The Trump administration is attempting to deny citizenship to the children of same-sex couples born abroad, as The Daily Beast first reported.
- According to policies enacted in the summer of 2018, “a child born abroad must be biologically related to a US citizen parent” to be granted US citizenship at birth.
- However, children carried by gestational surrogates or conceived through other methods of Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) may be considered “born out of wedlock” by the State Department.
- This policy not only impacts children carried by surrogates across country lines, but also bi-national couples, effectively questioning the validity of their marriages in the eyes of the government.
- In February 2019, a federal judge ruled against the policy, calling it a “strained interpretation,” Slate reported.
- Visit INSIDER’s homepage for more stories.
The Trump administration is attempting to deny US citizenship to the children of same-sex couples born abroad, The Daily Beast reports.
According to US law, a child born outside of the US is granted US citizenship at birth if their parents are married and at least one is a US citizen. But currently, this is not being extended to married same-sex couples.
The policy changes were first enacted in the summer of 2018 and are related to the Immigration and Nationality Act, which pertains to birthright citizenship. According to the policy, “a child born abroad must be biologically related to a US citizen parent … in order for the child to acquire US citizenship at birth.”
According to the government website, in order for a child to be considered a US citizen its father “must be the genetic parent of the child and meet all other statutory requirements in order to transmit US citizenship to the child at birth.” Additionally, it notes that if the baby is carried by its biological mother or a gestational surrogate, that person must meet those same requirements.
“Even if local law recognizes a surrogacy agreement and finds that US parents are the legal parents of a child conceived and born abroad through Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART), if the child does not have a biological connection to a US citizen parent, the child will not be a US citizen at birth,” the government website says.
“This is a very clear attack on families”
And even if the parents are legally married, children carried by gestational surrogates or conceived through other methods of ART may be considered “born out of wedlock” by the state department.
Speaking to The Daily Beast, same-sex couple Roee and Adiel Kiviti said the US government told them their 2-month-old daughter Kessem was born “out of wedlock” because a surrogate gave birth to her in Canada rather than in the US.
“We are now in a very, very strange scenario,” Adiel said. “We are both American citizens; we live in the US; I have a business here, Roee has his job here; we file our taxes as a married couple here… and the State Department is saying that our daughter isn’t entitled to US citizenship because she was born ‘out of wedlock.'”
Soon after Kessem was born the couple contacted the US consulate in Calgary to obtain a Consular Report of Birth Abroad for Kessem, which is comparable to a birth certificate.
But they weren’t issued one. The consulate asked for proof of the couple’s marriage in the form of their original marriage certificate, which they didn’t have. So they traveled back to the US, with just Kessem’s Canadian passport.
The couple hadn’t encountered these issues in 2016 when their son Lev was born in Canada.
“This is a very clear attack on families, on American families,” Roee told The Daily Beast. “Denying American married couples their rights to pass their citizenship, that is flat-out discrimination, and everyone should be concerned about this.”
A federal judge recently ruled against the policy
The policy also impacts binational couples, in which one parent is a US citizen and the other is not, who have children outside the US.
One such married couple is Andrew and Elad Dvash-Banks, who have taken their case to court, as Slate reported.
Their case, which was filed on behalf of Immigration Equality, details that Andrew is an American citizen and his husband Elad is an Israeli citizen. Their sons, twin boys, were carried by a gestational surrogate and born in Canada, according to Slate.
Both men wanted to be genetically connected to their children, and so Andrew and Elad each fertilized an embryo. A DNA test revealed that Andrew was genetically tied to Aiden and Ethan was genetically tied to Elad. But because Elad is not a US citizen, Ethan was denied US citizenship.
Officials claimed that he was “born out of wedlock.”
In February, a judge ruled in favor of the men, saying that “the basis for the State Department’s imposition of a biological requirement is its strained interpretation.” This month, the State Department moved to appeal the court’s decision.
“We’re outraged that the State Department is so intent on harming our family and the LGBTQ community,” Andrew and Elad said in a joint statement to Immigration Equality. “The fight is not over, and we will not rest until our family is treated fairly and equally. Nothing can tear us apart. The four of us are unbreakable.”
For others, like Roee and Adiel and their daughter Kessem, the question of citizenship still hangs unanswered.
“Where is my child supposed to live? Is she supposed to go back to Canada? Can I live there?” Adiel told The Daily Beast. “The scenario is just ridiculous. I cannot believe that these are the values of the American government.”
- Read more:
- Border Patrol stations have become so overcrowded that migrants are being flown to other less-busy stations to be processed
- Border Patrol just set up 2 new ‘tent cities’ for migrants. Here’s a look inside.
- Border Patrol found a crying 3-year-old alone in a cornfield with a phone number written on his shoes
- New York’s $25 billion Hudson Yards development claimed funding from a year’s worth of immigrant visas – here’s why it was legal