- Brendan McDermid/Reuters
- The winner of the 2019 New York marathon, Geoffrey Kamworor, and the world marathon record holder, Eliud Kipchoge, both wear Nike Vaporfly shoes.
- Research suggests Vaporflys give runners more energetic efficiency because the shoes’ foam-and-carbon sole structure ensures less energy is lost with each step.
- One researcher thinks World Athletics, which governs most international track and field events, should regulate the thickness of shoes’ midsoles to avoid any unfair advantages.
- World Athletics told Business Insider that it hopes to make an announcement at the end of this month regarding a possible ban on the shoe technology.
- Visit Business Insider’s homepage for more stories.
The winner of the 2019 New York City marathon and the fastest marathoner in the world share a few things in common: They’re both from Kenya, they train together, and they wear Nike Vaporfly running shoes.
Geoffrey Kamworor wore the shoes on November 3, when he finished the New York marathon in 2 hours, 8 minutes, and 13 seconds. Eliud Kipchoge, who holds the world marathon record, donned a Vaporfly prototype in October when he ran the first sub-2-hour marathon ever.
But some runners and researchers think the footwear confers an unfair advantage. Both independent and Nike-sponsored studies have confirmed that the shoes increase athletes’ energetic efficiency by 4% or more, which yields significant dividends in marathon-length distances. The shoes’ foam and carbon-fiber sole is designed to ensure that less energy is lost in each footfall.
World Athletics, which governs most international track and field events (it was formerly known as the International Association of Athletics Federations), formed a working group to review the shoe and its technology last fall.
Now, a decision from the group could come within weeks.
Nicole Jefferies, head of communications for World Athletics, told Business Insider in an email on Wednesday that the group “is still deliberating at this point, but we hope to be able to make an announcement at the end of this month.”
“Any change to the rule must be approved by the World Athletics Council, so no decision has been made yet,” she added.
The Nike Vaporfly sole helps runners lose less energy per step
Jake Riley, an American runner who finished ninth in the 2019 Chicago marathon, has said the Nike Vaporfly 4% shoes feel like “running on trampolines.”
The secret is in the sole, which is designed to help runners get the most forward push for each stride – in other words, run faster for the same energy expenditure. The soles consist of a foam layer and carbon-fiber plate fused together.
In addition to protecting our legs from the impact of striking the ground, running shoes store and release energy to propel us forward. The midsole acts like a spring, compressing when a runner lands, storing the energy from that foot strike, and expanding again to return that stored energy into the ground to push them forward.
Not all of that stored energy gets returned with each footfall, though – some dissipates as heat. But the Vaporfly’s design minimizes that of lost energy, giving the runner more bang for the buck.
“The runner runs the race, but the shoe enables him or her to run it faster for the same effort or ability,” Geoff Burns, a kinesiology researcher and pro-runner, told Business Insider in an email. “So for two athletes of equal ability on race day, the one with the shoes is going to beat the one without the shoes.”
Traditional running shoes generally use ethylene vinyl-acetate foam, which returns about 65% of the energy you put into it, according to Burns. The Vaporfly, by contrast, uses a new type of foam called Pebax, which is about 87% efficient. (The patent is owned by a French chemical company called Arkema.) The addition of the carbon-fiber plate helps the Pebax foam compress and expand quickly.
“Otherwise it would be like a marshmallow,” Burns added.
Kyle Barnes, a movement scientist who authored a study about the Vaporfly shoes in February, told Business Insider that the carbon-fiber plate is curved under the front of the shoes, which also makes a big difference. That curvature, he said, helps quickly rock a runner from their heels to their toes as they land and push off again.
“As soon as you put the shoes on, you have this ‘Aha!’ moment in which you know these are different than anything you’ve put on before,” Barnes said. “I have several pairs.”
Over 26.2 miles, 4% more efficiency is a lot
Barnes’ February 2019 study, which he conducted independently of Nike, found that the Vaporfly shoes improved an athlete’s running economy by 4.2% compared to Adidas Adizero Adios 3 shoes.
Another independent study looked at early Vaporfly models in November 2017 and reached the same conclusion: “The prototype shoes lowered the energetic cost of running by 4% on average,” the researchers wrote.
Over marathon-length distances, 4% can mean a lot – a person running a 2-hour-10-minute marathon would see a 3.5-minute improvement in speed. For athletes like Kamworor and Riley, that could be the difference between setting a world record and falling short.
The authors of the 2017 study even predicted at the time that “with these shoes, top athletes could run substantially faster and achieve the first sub-2-hour marathon.”
Two years later, that prediction came true.
In October, Kipchoge completed the Ineos 1:59 Challenge marathon in Vienna – an event arranged specifically for him to attempt a sub-two-hour marathon – in 1 hour, 59 minutes, 40 seconds.
- Leonhard Foeger/Reuters
Kipchoge was wearing a prototype of the Nike Vaporfly, called AlphaFly, which hasn’t hit the market yet. The phalanx of pace-setters that kept him on track were also wearing Vaporflys.
The Nike Vaporfly has already taken over the marathon world
Kipchoge’s sub-2-hour marathon didn’t set a new world record according to World Athletics rules, but he did break the world marathon record in Berlin in 2018 – when he also wore Vaporflys.
In September, when Kamworor set the record for fastest half-marathon (58 minutes and 1 second), he was also in Vaporflys.
In fact, the $250 neon shoes (they come in bright green, pink, and orange) have been involved in nearly every major running milestone for the last three years. In 2019, runners wearing Vaporflys claimed 31 out of the 36 male and female podium spots in the six biggest marathons around the world. The three medalists in the men’s marathon at the 2016 Summer Olympics all wore a Vaporfly prototype.
In the 2019 Chicago marathon, the top 10 male finishers were wearing the shoes, too. And female runner Brigid Kosgei, who broke the world record in the 2019 Chicago race with a time of 2 hours, 14 minutes, and 4 seconds, wore Vaporflys to accomplish that feat.
- Mike Segar/Reuters
“It’s hard to know what we’re actually watching in some respects – is it the technology, or the athletes?” Barnes said. “I know you have to be an exceptional human being to come close to these achievements, but the jumps we’re seeing is the technology.”
World Athletics hasn’t made any move to ban or regulate the sneakers, despite some recent news stories suggesting a ban is imminent. Currently, the rules say shoes can’t confer an “unfair assistance or advantage” and have to be “reasonably available” to everyone. But the organization doesn’t define those standards more specifically. According to Jefferies, the working group assessing the Vaporfly tech is also reviewing the wording around the rule.
Barnes compared the Vaporfly trend to the swimming races at the 2008 Beijing Olympics, in which competitors set 25 world records. That year, 98% of the Olympic field was wearing Speedo’s LZR Racer swimsuit, a full-body sleeve of polyurethane designed to mimic shark skin.
“They called it ‘technology doping,'” Barnes said. “Even non-Speedo athletes had to switch and wear the suit or there was no chance of them competing. We’re not quite at that point yet with the Vaporflys, but close.”
In 2009, the International Swimming Federation banned all full-body polyurethane suits, including the LZR.
But when asked last year whether the Nike Vaporfly 4% shoes confer an advantage, Kamworor said, “I don’t think that the shoe is a factor.”
“Provided that you are prepared, that you are training hard, you can run with any kind of shoe. So the shoe is not a disadvantage to other people,” he said in a press conference.
- Lucy Nicholson/Reuters
Still, Burns and Barnes both said they don’t think the recent running records, as well as Kipchoge’s sub-2-hour marathon, would have been possible in different footwear.
Nor does Mary Wittenberg, the former New York Road Runners president.
“I actually think we’re going to have asterisks on all the results that are like AV and BV – Before Vaporfly,” she told The Wall Street Journal before the 2019 New York marathon.
Should the IAAF regulate running shoes?
Many runners sponsored by other shoe companies would like to see World Athletics lay down additional rules about shoes. Sara Hall, an Asics-sponsored runner and Ryan Hall’s wife, told Outside Online last year that because of the shoes, “it’s hard to really just celebrate performances at face value right now.”
“I think it would help to have some limits, just like other sports have, like swimming, or triathlon, or cycling,” she added. “They all have limits of the gear. So I think that would help create more of an even playing field.”
According to Burns, one option for World Athletics could be to limit how thick a shoe’s midsole can be – he proposed this in an October paper.
“As we allow that height limit to go greater and greater, more and more of that energy recycling is being done by the shoe, so the performances are less and less human,” he said.
Current Vaporfly models have 1.4 inch-thick soles, whereas midsoles of other racing shoes generally hover around 1 inch, Burns noted. So in his paper, he suggested capping thickness at 1 inch.
That “would define the space on a runner that can be a ‘shoe’ and allow companies to innovate within that space,” Burns said.
Such a rule would disqualify Vaporflys.
“I think we need to draw a line,” Burns said. ” If I got to draw the line, I would draw it so as to preserve the performances of the past 40 years at the cost of the last three years.”