- Paul Donovan, a UBS Wealth Management economist, says cryptocurrencies like bitcoin can never truly be considered currencies.
- “A currency has to be a widely used medium of exchange,” he said. “Cryptocurrencies are never going to achieve that. Period.”
- They fail key tests for a currency, he says, including acting as a store of value.
LONDON – Cryptocurrencies like bitcoin and ether will never become true currencies because of a series of “fatal” flaws, a senior economist at the Swiss banking giant UBS says.
At a roundtable discussion attended by Business Insider on Thursday, Paul Donovan, the global chief economist at UBS’s wealth management arm, tore into the argument that cryptocurrencies could eventually replace fiat currencies like the pound and the dollar.
“The problem that cryptocurrencies face is that they fail the two key metrics of what makes a currency a currency,” Donovan said. “A currency has to be a widely used medium of exchange. Cryptocurrencies are never going to achieve that. Period.”
One of the main reasons for this, Donovan said, has to do with taxation and the inability to use cryptocurrencies to settle tax liabilities.
“The reason I’m so definite about this is that if you look in the OECD, on average, 34% of all economic activity is taxed,” he said, using the abbreviation for the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. “Governments are not likely to accept cryptocurrencies that they do not control” to settle taxes.
He continued: “Cryptocurrencies that they do not control will not be accepted by governments for tax payments. You are therefore removing one of the main sources of demand for a currency. One of the key issues, whenever we talk about monetary economics, is that the money supply should never, ever, ever be considered in isolation.
“Money supply needs to be considered against money demand. If you do not have the ability to use cryptocurrencies for the largest single transaction in the economy, then it will never be a majority medium of exchange.”
Using the example of the 1,000-year-old jiaozi – widely believed to be the first paper currency – Donovan pointed out what he saw as fatal flaws in the current crypto market.
“If you’re interested in historical parallels, the 10th- or 11th-century kingdom of Sichuan introduced a paper currency,” he said. “It was an enormous success initially because the kingdom of Sichuan insisted that people pay their taxes using paper currency. As a result, there was an enormous demand, and initially, the paper currency kept its value.
“Unfortunately, there weren’t any economists in the kingdom of Sichuan, and they just kept printing the stuff, and then money supply exceeded demand, and it all went horribly wrong.”
Donovan thinks cryptocurrencies are almost certain to end up having huge imbalances in supply and demand because there is effectively an unlimited supply of them but a clear demand ceiling.
“The fatal issue for cryptocurrencies is that the supply of them can only ever go up,” he said. “There is unlimited upside to the supply of cryptocurrencies.”
He continued: “An individual cryptocurrency may have a ceiling on supply, but if were to introduce the Donovan cryptocurrency next week – which clearly would be superior to all existing cryptocurrencies – then what you would see would be a massive move out of existing cryptocurrencies and into the new, technically superior currency.
“And because you cannot reduce the supply of a cryptocurrency, that drop in demand would not be matched by a drop in supply, and, therefore, if demand goes down but supply does not, we all know what happens to value. It is basic economics.”
The increasing supply of cryptocurrencies can be seen in the recent boom in so-called initial coin offerings, in which startups issue digital coins or tokens in exchange for real money used to fund projects. Over $3 billion has been raised using the method so far this year.
Without a central bank to regulate things like bitcoin, Donovan said, there is no way of controlling the supply.
“The Federal Reserve is reducing money supply in the USA at the rate of $10 billion a month,” he said, because “demand for liquid dollars has dropped, and in order to preserve the value of the dollar – i.e., avoid inflation – the Fed is reducing money supply to match a reduction in demand.”
“That cannot happen with a cryptocurrency,” he said.
Furthermore, Donovan said, a key feature of a currency is that it acts as a store of value – meaning you can put your money into it and be reasonably sure that in normal circumstances its value will not fluctuate massively.
Cryptocurrencies cannot do that, he says.
“Bitcoin, in particular, has had, I think, three hyperinflation episodes this year,” he said. “That is to say its ability to purchase goods has dropped more than 25% in the course of a week. That is not a particularly stable store of value.
“Cryptocurrencies are, at the moment, universally treated as assets, not as currencies, for tax purposes.”
He added: “What that means is that if the price of bitcoin rises against the pound sterling and I cash in, I am liable to capital-gains tax on the appreciation of the currency. If the value of sterling rises 20% against the US dollar, then I am not liable to capital-gains tax on that appreciation.”