A study published today in the American Society for Microbiology’s journal mSystems could change the way we predict and prevent public health outbreaks.
Scientists from the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health descended into the Boston subway system to study the germs (microbes) that are found there. With an unimaginable number of microbes moving between people and subway surfaces every single day, the scientists wanted to see how much of a threat the microbes posed to the public.
So, the team took samples from different surfaces throughout the Boston subway stations and on the trains. They swabbed seats, poles, hanging grips, walls, and the touchscreens of ticketing machines.
This was no small task. “We initially planned the study in the summer of 2012, sampled in spring and fall of 2013, and data generation took place over the course of two years after that,” Curtis Huttenhower, the study’s main author, told Business Insider.” Analysis and interpretation took quite a bit of time, so we could make sure the data were high quality.”
The researchers found that the surface type, and the way people interact with these surfaces, were the biggest factors in determining which microbes they found. For example, skin microbes were found more on poles and hanging grips than on seat backs.
Scientists were curious about how harmful germs in public transportation systems actually are. Surprisingly, the research team found only very few worrisome pathogens on the surfaces with which people interact frequently. In fact, there were fewer virulent microbes in the subway than there are in the human intestines.In addition, the microbe communities did not change significantly across geographic areas or from station to station.
This is good news: Travelers riding the Boston subway face less harmful germs every ride than one might have expected. And importantly, now the researchers have a baseline for future comparisons. This means that if there is a public health outbreak, scientists might detect it early on by comparing their study results with new swabs.
Huttenhower says that the team is planning to continue this study in the future to see if the subway microbes are surviving or if they are actively growing on surfaces. He also hopes to take samples during different times of the year to look for seasonal changes. For example, how would hot weather or flu season affect the microbial profile of the Boston subway?
As the database builds, scientists will be better able to predict and prevent outbreaks that lurk in the future.